<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Branding: So Subjective!</title>
	<link>http://blog.openskye.com/2009/06/23/branding-so-subjective/</link>
	<description>Does Anyone Read This?</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 09:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://blog.openskye.com/2009/06/23/branding-so-subjective/#comment-2705</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.openskye.com/2009/06/23/branding-so-subjective/#comment-2705</guid>
		<description>I like the change.  To me to connotation of the word seems a bit one sided. You would “design” something for someone where most clients was someone they can collaborate with.
I realized this when I had a small company with the word “designs” in the name and I solicited some feedback.
Of course this is only a perception since we all know the value of partnership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the change.  To me to connotation of the word seems a bit one sided. You would “design” something for someone where most clients was someone they can collaborate with.<br />
I realized this when I had a small company with the word “designs” in the name and I solicited some feedback.<br />
Of course this is only a perception since we all know the value of partnership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
